Posted on

CA Democrats Want to Raise the Gas Tax to Pay for Dam, Road Fixes

After posting up a picture of a San Bernardino County Fire Truck that lay on it’s side in a river of mud about 30 feet below the freeway surface, I got a flurry of comments on my Facebook Page from people criticizing me for blaming California’s elected leaders for what Mother Nature did.

That picture and the dramatic footage of the Studio City sinkhole that swallowed two cars have done what California’s infrastructure hawks couldn’t do for a decade: forced the question.  Those graphic images combined with the near catastrophic failure of the Oroville Dam—did more to make the public pay attention and care about the condition of California’s roads, bridges and dams than decades of warnings.

According to an LA Daily Breeze story, it’s been a wake up call for politicians and the public alike, but one California Democrat, state Sen. Jim Beall, D-San Jose, is pushing a proposal to raise $6 billion in new money by raising gas taxes.

Beall has proposed boosting the per-gallon gas tax by 12 cents, the diesel excise tax by 20 cents and the sales tax by 4 percent, plus enact an annual $100 fee on zero-emission vehicles.

“I’m not surprised by any of this that is happening right now because we have been delaying maintenance everywhere,” said Hasan Ikhrata, executive director of the Los Angeles-based Southern California Association of Governments.

Former San Bernardino Mayor Patrick Morris quickly drew the same conclusion.

“I guess that’s testimony of the amount of maintenance needed in California,” Morris told the Breeze by phone.

“When you get rainstorms like we’ve experienced over the last several weeks, suddenly reality sets in,” he said.

State Sen. Jeff Stone, R-Temecula, termed the damage a wake-up call – and symbol.

“It’s symbolic that we’re not paying attention to infrastructure,” Stone said. “It’s a symptom of a greater problem. It all comes down to neglect.”

Even some Democrats are willing to concede that infrastructure must  become a priority.

Former Assemblyman Mike Gatto, D-Glendale admitted that the storm damage reflect the lack of attention California leaders have given to transportation lately.

“Some of it is human nature,” Gatto said.

He said public officials, like everyday people, often react to problems and challenges rather than plan for them in advance.

“But you can’t attribute all of this to human nature,” he said. “We need a little more forethought in our state.”

Perhaps this rare note of agreement by both parties can lead to action.

Getting back to even will be daunting.

Ikhrata said a recent analysis estimated there is a 10-year, $296 billion backlog of maintenance for the state as a whole, and a $190 billion backlog for the six counties the association represents.

“This is just to bring the system up to par,” he said.

A Few Suggested Solutions:

  • We need to pass a budget that reflects and prioritizes our actual priorities.
  • Gov’t doesn’t exist to give everyone a cushy job and a retirement, so renegotiate every contract starting with our elected officials from the top down, and include every single state employee, union and non-union alike, get rid of duplicate agencies, and cut down the number of regulations so you can fire a lot of the unnecessary regulators, saving money.
  • Cut off every penny of direct and indirect aid that is taxpayer-funded to illegal aliens. If people want to help them, let them do it with their charity, not our infrastructure dollars.
  • Figure out the savings from above actions and invest it from the general fund (not more borrowed bond money) into the most critical infrastructure projects in the order of urgency
  • Dams, Waterways, Bridges, Roads only, not enviro-pork or politician’s pet projects like high speed rail, or sand dunes in Pismo or bike paths in San Diego.

That’s what I’d do to start. Lots of other things need to be done, but if we stopped spending so much money on things that Gov’t was never intended to do, we could begin an aggressive campaign to update, repair, and expand our infrastructure (much like they did in the 1940’s and 1950’s to sustain the 38 Million Californians who now live here. It’s not complicated, but it would require some hard choices.

Tim Donnelly is a former California State Assemblyman, who ran for CA Governor in 2014.  His first book, Patriot Not Politician:  Win or Go Homeless exposes the endless corruption within California’s dysfunctional legislature.   You can buy an autographed copy here, or click here to order a standard copy of the book on Amazon.




14 thoughts on “CA Democrats Want to Raise the Gas Tax to Pay for Dam, Road Fixes

  1. You have my vote. These are viable solutions. More tax at the gas pumps is not the solution. Some of us remember that there are already two taxes on the pump for so called road maintenance and repair… About 85 percent of the federal gas tax of 18.4 cents a gallon goes to highways, and the remaining 15 percent goes for transit.

    On the state side, our 48.6 cents-a-gallon tax brings in around $5 billion a year. Of the total, about 57 percent goes to highways, 36 percent for cities and counties (for various needs, mostly streets and roads) and 7 percent for transit.


  3. We can’t maintain our infrastructure, but we can afford a high speed train no one will use?

  4. There should be no welfare payments to illegal aliens. All food stamp recipients should have to work to receive them; that would reduce the number of users by as much as one-third. Schools should stop paying for students’ food. Those three changes would save a lot on the state’s budget.

  5. So if you are in a high income bracket and can afford a Tesla then receive a big tax break but pay no gas tax for the roads you drive on doesn’t make sense to me.

    1. Kinda like spending those dollars on bike lanes for people that don’t buy gas, pay registration, renew licenses or ………….

  6. California does not have an INCOME problem. California has a SPENDING PROBLEM!! No matter how righteous the ‘initially proposed need’, money gets “osmosis-ed” away long before the need is attended to.

    While no state is ‘perfect’, the above is a good share of the reason I moved away. “Not My Governor, Not My Politics.

    1. Agreed

  7. I used to live in California for most of my adult life, ( I moved to Northern Nevada, thank God),. This garbage with redirecting state funds to illegals is NOT new . It has been happening for a few decades now. I-10, all adjoining freeways in SoCal, Hwy 99, have any of you driven on these lately??? The state workers milk the system, taking YEARS to do the repairs!!!! 99 is a friggin’ joke. Here in Nevada, shit gets done, bam, boom. And our roads are perfect. Yea, take a drive to the state line and you will see the difference….

    1. You are correct. I have homes in California and Nevada. But be aware, the California mentality is creeping into Nevada with the same approach that happened over the years in Ca. Remember when we voted two to one against gun control and slowly politicians have produced bills to weaken our ability to own firearms?

  8. When I lived in California, one thing I noted. Cal legislators would vote in a tax and start spending the money before the tax was even realized only to find out that the projected income was inflated or diverted and the state deficit grew, so they vote in another tax to offset that deficit while over projecting the income. This caused, time after time, unemployment, business failure, businesses leaving etc. Spending any income on charity is a failure of any government. A government should concern itself with creating an environment within it’s bounds that allows and encourages an opportunity for everyone to succeed. Charity can not and should not be mandated. If income taxes are used for social welfare programs ( a politically correct term designed to confuse so as not to understand that it is charity) then the Taxpayer should be allowed to deduct the percentage of paid taxes equal to the government percent of received taxes devoted to charity

  9. Why don’t the celebrities pay for it

  10. another tax, no way if you dont use the current gas tax on roads now what makes you think they will do it in the future

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *